Skip to content

A.K. Burns, Jason Hirata, Zoe Leonard, K.R.M. Mooney, Ulrike Müller, Carissa Rodriguez, Alan Ruiz

Overture

Opening: Sunday, March 31, 6–8pm

March 31 – May 5, 2019

A view of the gallery's front desk with a black plastic container for press releases.

Installation view, Overture, Callicoon Fine Arts, New York, NY, 2019. 

A side-view of the black plastic container holding press releases, and one Zoe Leonard artwork

Installation view, Overture, Callicoon Fine Arts, New York, NY, 2019. 

An installation view of one Zoe Leonard photograph and a bronze artwork by K.R.M. Mooney, installed on the ground.

Installation view, Overture, Callicoon Fine Arts, New York, NY, 2019. 

An installation view of one K.R.M Mooney bronze sculpture installed on the floor, and one aluminum panel hosting a drawing by Jason Hirata

Installation view, Overture, Callicoon Fine Arts, New York, NY, 2019. 

An installation view of 2 aluminum panels hung on the wall, each of which host drawings by Jason Hirata of contorting figures in brown ink on yellow paper

Installation view, Overture, Callicoon Fine Arts, New York, NY, 2019. 

An installation view of K.R.M. Mooney's bronze sculpture installed on the floor, with an enamel painting by Ulrike Muller behind it and at left; a Zoe Leonard photograph at right, both black and white, hung on the wall.

Installation view, Overture, Callicoon Fine Arts, New York, NY, 2019. 

An installation view of one aluminum panel by Jason Hirata, and Ulrike Muller's enamel painting. In the background, we see the entrance to the back gallery.

Installation view, Overture, Callicoon Fine Arts, New York, NY, 2019. 

An installation view of the back gallery, which includes one aluminum panel with drawing by Jason Hirata in brown ink on yellow paper, and an industrial LED light illuminating the panel. The lights are on in the gallery.

Installation view, Overture, Callicoon Fine Arts, New York, NY, 2019. 

A side-view of the LED industrial light int he back gallery and an Ulrike Muller enamel on steel artwork, which depicts 2 circles overlapping. One circle is a red outline, the other is a filled beige circle.

Installation view, Overture, Callicoon Fine Arts, New York, NY, 2019. 

An installation view of the LED industrial light straight-on, with Ulrike Muller's enamel on steel work (2 circles interlacing) at right. To the left we see the entry way back to the main gallery.

Installation view, Overture, Callicoon Fine Arts, New York, NY, 2019. 

An installation view of Ulrike Muller's enamel on steel painting and a Zoe Leonard photograph, both black and gray tones. Ulrike's piece depicts a large black circle with a smaller grey circle at bottom-right. Zoe's piece is a series of black birds flying in circles over several brownstones in Brooklyn.

Installation view, Overture, Callicoon Fine Arts, New York, NY, 2019. 

Press Release

8.5’’ x 11” paper was already corporate America’s preferred paper size when in 1981 it became US Letter. Enacted during an era known for national austerity measures and fiscal policies of deregulation, the Federal Paperwork Reduction Act, signed into law by President Ronald Reagan, mandates the standard usage of 8.5” x 11” for all government business. The law did not enforce what the page might contain, but rather the standards by which information would be retained and circulated, reducing the need for translating between various authorities and systems of collection. US Letter remains that ubiquitous carrier of tax identification, financial statements, legal documents, invoices, health insurance coverage, press, publicity, check lists, and rejection letters. Even US Letter’s immaterial cousin, the Portable Document Format (PDF) which was introduced in 1993, is traditionally formatted for printing at 8.5” x 11”. Against the romance of a blank page, today the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) oversees this “voluntary consensus standard” pointing to the creeping homogenization of everyday life as well as to the way the formal properties of US Letter (also known as ANSI A or ANSI Letter) have served as an operative agent in the design of North American envelopes, folders, binders, filing cabinets, printers, software and an array of other administrative systems. As indicated by ANSI A, the form of a work is not only bound by its shape, contour, or chemical makeup, but extends to the way it operates within a larger field. 

Spaces around the world form “soft laws” by adhering to certain standards. For instance, an actor-network of familiar fluorescence maps the “suggested” illumination that correlates restrooms (150 Lux) to production lines (200 - 700 Lux) to medical examination rooms (300 - 750 Lux) to offices (500 Lux) to supermarkets (750 Lux) to storefront windows (1,500 - 3,000 Lux). Light may modulate these spaces according to the productive action taking place within them, but it may equally be weaponized as a deterrent from counter-productive acts such as loitering or sleeping. The radiating effects of illumination and ANSI A — both effervescent and material — suggests that the content of a medium may matter less than what it makes possible or impossible.

Yet the bureaucratic standardization of a form lays bare the potential for counter-factual and subversive action and uses of material. Bricks may be used to build yet they may also be used to break storefront windows. Within any given space infrastructures are working independent of our focus or attention: air circulation may go unnoticed until vents become congested or audible; sheetrock enveloping a room is revealed to be a container when it becomes soggy and the electrical wiring beneath its thin frame malfunctions. Indeed, data is structured within existing conditions —  the enameled surface, lingering perfume, seating arrangement, or agitated group member all constitute information oscillating within a system. Sites, however standardized, are not contained but active and always evolving. In this sense, attention to an object’s circulation may offer an understanding of form-making as active and relational rather than static and autonomous. Learning from the situational reflexivity of ANSI A, radical formalisms privilege the ground as much as the figure, the field as inextricable from the object. Engaging existing conditions in order to reroute predicted outcomes, they may work to underscore a system that is already present, or to indicate what is not yet perceptible. In the register of the social they offer ways of rehearsing political engagement as doing rather than saying. 

— Alan Ruiz

Back To Top